4.5 Article

GaitSense: Towards Ubiquitous Gait-Based Human Identification with Wi-Fi

期刊

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3466638

关键词

Gait recognition; channel state information; commodity Wi-Fi

资金

  1. National Key Research Plan [2018AAA0101200]
  2. NSFC [61832010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents GaitSense, a Wi-Fi-based human identification system, that overcomes the unrealistic assumptions of existing Wi-Fi sensing approaches and improves the system's applicability in new deployment scenarios through transfer learning and data augmentation techniques.
Gait, the walking manner of a person, has been perceived as a physical and behavioral trait for human identification. Comparedwith cameras andwearable sensors, Wi-Fi-based gait recognition is more attractive because Wi-Fi infrastructure is almost available everywhere and is able to sense passively without the requirement of on-body devices. However, existing Wi-Fi sensing approaches impose strong assumptions of fixed user walking trajectories, sufficient training data, and identification of already known users. In this article, we present GaitSense, a Wi-Fi-based human identification system, to overcome the above unrealistic assumptions. To deal with various walking trajectories and speeds, GaitSense first extracts target specific features that best characterize gait patterns and applies novel normalization algorithms to eliminate gait irrelevant perturbation in signals. On this basis, GaitSense reduces the training efforts in new deployment scenarios by transfer learning and data augmentation techniques. GaitSense also enables a distinct feature of illegal user identification by anomaly detection, making the system readily available for real-world deployment. Our implementation and evaluation with commodity Wi-Fi devices demonstrate a consistent identification accuracy across various deployment scenarios with little training samples, pushing the limit of gait recognition with Wi-Fi signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据