4.6 Article

Analysis of vertebral chemistry to assess stock structure in a deep-sea shark, Etmopterus spinax

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 74, 期 3, 页码 793-803

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsw176

关键词

deep-sea; LA-ICP-MS; shark; stock structure; vertebral chemistry

资金

  1. Playford Memorial Trust
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [LP120100652]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP120100652] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep-sea sharks play a valuable ecological role helping maintain food web balance, yet they are vulnerable to commercial fishing because of slow growth rates and low reproductive capacity. Overfishing of sharks can heavily impact marine ecosystems and the fisheries these support. Knowledge of stock structure is integral to sustainable management of fisheries. The present study analysed vertebral chemistry using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) to assay concentrations of Li-7, Na-23, Mg-24, Mn-55, Co-59, Ni-60, Cu-63, Zn-66, Rb-85, Sr-88, Ba-138 and Pb-208 to assess stock structure in a deep-sea shark, Etmopterus spinax, in Norwegian and French waters. Few studies have applied this technique to elasmobranch vertebrae and the present study represents its first application to a deep-sea shark. Three stocks were identified at the regional scale off western Norway, southern Norway, and France. At finer spatial scales there was evidence of strong population mixing. Overall, the general pattern of stock structure outlined herein provides some indication of the spatial scales at which stocks should be viewed as distinct fisheries management units. The identification of an effective multi-element signature for distinguishing E. spinax stocks utilizing Sr, Ba, Mg, Zn and Pb and the methodological groundwork laid in the present study could also expedite future research into stock structure for E. spinax and deep-sea elasmobranchs more generally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据