4.5 Article

Likely frost events at Gale crater: Analysis from MSL/REMS measurements

期刊

ICARUS
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 93-102

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.12.004

关键词

Mars, surface; Mars, atmosphere; Ices

资金

  1. JPL grant [1449038]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [BES-2012-059241]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We provide indirect evidence for the formation of frost at the surface of Gale crater by analyzing the highest confidence data from simultaneous measurements of relative humidity and ground temperature during the first 1000 sols of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission. We find that except for sol 44, frost events could have occurred only between sols 400 and 710, corresponding to the most humid and coldest time of the year (from early fall to late winter). In particular, measurements at Dingo Gap during sols 529-535, at an unnamed place during sols 554-560, at Kimberley during sols 609-617 and at an unnamed place during sols 673-676 showed the largest likelihood of the occurrence of frost events. At these four locations, the terrain is composed of fine-grained and loosely packed material with thermal inertia values of similar to 200 SI units, much lower than the 365 +/- 50 SI units value found at the landing ellipse. This is important because terrains with exceptionally low thermal inertia favor the formation of frost by lowering minimum daily ground temperatures. An order-of-magnitude calculation to determine the thickness of the frost layer at these four locations results in values of tenths of pm, while the precipitable water content is a few pr-mu m. Therefore, surface frost events can have important implications for the local water cycle at Gale crater. In addition, frost is the most likely type of water that can be temporarily found in bulk amounts on the surface of Mars at low latitudes and therefore can cause weathering, influencing the geology of Gale crater. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据