4.7 Article

Thiosulfate leaching of Au, Ag and Pd from a high Sn, Pb and Sb bearing decopperized anode slime

期刊

HYDROMETALLURGY
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 278-287

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.06.011

关键词

Copper anode slime; Gold, silver and palladium; Acetic acid pretreatment; Thiosulfate leaching; Passivation layer

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51504293]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M550422]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2015JJ3149]
  4. postdoctoral workstation and High Performance Computing Center of the Central South University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compared with Au+ and Ag+, Pd2+ is easier to be complexed by S2O32- in ideal situation, based on DFT (density functional theory) calculation. Thermodynamics analysis shows that palladium can also be effectively leached by ammoniacal thiosulfate solution besides gold and silver. The Sn and Sb in a high Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Pb and Sb bearing decopperized anode slime had no obvious detrimental effect on thiosulfate leaching of the precious metals, but the Pb could cause seriously detrimental impact. Only 373% of Au, 69.2% of Ag and 43.8% of Pd in the decopperized anode slime could be extracted by direct thiosulfate leaching. After sodium hydroxide pretreatment where 56.9% of Pb and 13.6% of Sb in the slime were removed, thiosulfate leaching under optimal operating conditions only extracted 68.1% of Au, 81.7% of Ag and 67.6% of Pd in the pretreatment residue. The low extraction is probably because there was a PbO passivation layer on slime particle surfaces. After the carbonate transformation and subsequent acetic acid pretreatment in which 93.8% of Pb in the transforming residue was removed, thiosulfate leaching could extract as much as 88.0% of Au, 93.4% of Ag and 80.7% of Pd in the pretreatment residue. There was no such passivation layer on the surfaces of slime particles during the leaching, attributing to comparatively thorough removal of Pb by the pretreatment. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据