4.6 Article

Hydrological connectivity determining metacommunity structure of planktonic heterotrophic flagellates

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 781, 期 1, 页码 81-94

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-016-2824-5

关键词

Environmental heterogeneity; Dispersal; Species sorting; Limiting dispersal; Lakes; Lotic

资金

  1. post-graduate course in Ecology of Continental Aquatic Habitats (PEA, Maringa State University)
  2. NUPELIA
  3. Brazilian Research Council (CNPq)
  4. Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dispersal potential of organisms is directly related to the hydrological connectivity among habitats. We investigated if the relative role of the environmental and spatial components in structuring the heterotrophic flagellates depends on the degree of hydrological connectivity. Samplings were performed in aquatic environments of the Parana River floodplain, which differ in their degree of connectivity: lotic environments, connected lakes and isolated lakes (temporarily connected to the main river only during floods). We expect that communities in isolated lakes would be more subject to dispersal limitation, while in connected lakes and lotic environments the communities would be regulated mainly by environmental variables (species sorting). We sampled in the pelagic region of 23 environments during the low water period in 2014. The results of pRDA revealed that the contributions of environmental and spatial factors differed between the types of environments. The greater contribution of the environmental variables in structuring the flagellates metacommunity, regardless of the type of environment, may be related to the elevated dispersal capacity of microorganisms. The spatial component was also significant in the isolated lakes. Our results support the idea that microorganism communities are mainly structured by environmental factors, although the spatial component seems important when lakes are isolated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据