3.9 Article

Microstructure characterization of WC-9.2wt%Monel 400 fabricated using laser engineered net shaping

期刊

PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 431-443

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40964-021-00203-4

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Laser engineered net shaping; Cemented tungsten carbides; Nickel alloy; Microstructure; Hardness

资金

  1. Department of Science and Innovation
  2. National Research Foundation in South Africa [41292]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to improve the properties of a WC-9.2wt% Monel 400 alloy using LENS technology. Different microstructures were observed in the alloy, leading to variations in hardness profiles from the substrate-alloy interface to the alloy surface. The laser remelted alloy showed significantly higher surface hardness compared to other alloys.
To assess if a WC-9.2wt%Monel 400 alloy properties could be improved using LENS, one alloy was deposited onto a heated substrate and a second alloy was subjected to laser remelting of the final deposited layer. Microstructural characterization was performed using XRD, FESEM, EPMA, and Raman spectroscopy. Multiple microstructures were observed with eutectic, fishbone, and Fe/W-rich dendrites present in the fusion zone at the substrate-alloy interface, while needle-like, triangular and blocky carbides were found in the central regions, with acicular microstructures in the surface region. The alloy deposited onto the heated substrate had less eutectic and more fishbone structures in the fusion region. The laser remelted surface layer had a more homogenous acicular structure with minimal binder pooling compared to the other alloys. The spheroidal, cast WC/W2C powder particles were found to have core-rim structures after laser sintering. These microstructural variations resulted in a gradient hardness profile from the substrate-alloy interface to the alloy surface. The surface hardness of the laser remelted alloy was found to be significantly higher compared to the other alloys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据