4.5 Article

Combined genetic and splicing analysis of BRCA1 c.[594-2A>C; 641A>G] highlights the relevance of naturally occurring in-frame transcripts for developing disease gene variant classification algorithms

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 2256-2268

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddw094

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III - European Regional Development FEDER Funds [PI12/00539, PI15/00059, PI13/02030]
  2. French Ministry of Higher Education and Research
  3. University of Otago
  4. Mackenzie Charitable Foundation
  5. Health Research Council of New Zealand
  6. UK Higher Education Funding Council
  7. University of Southampton
  8. Cancer research UK
  9. FamilienHede Nielsen Foundation
  10. Cancer Research-UK
  11. National Institute of Health [CA128978, CA11616]
  12. NIH [CA128978, P50 CA116201]
  13. US Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  14. French National Cancer Institute
  15. Direction Generale de l'Offre des Soins (INCa-DGOS AAP/CFB/CI)
  16. French North-West Canceropole (CNO)
  17. Cancer Council Queensland [APP1086286]
  18. NHMRC [1061779, 1010719]
  19. National Breast Cancer Foundation
  20. National Health and Medical Research Council
  21. Queensland Cancer Fund
  22. Cancer Council of New South Wales
  23. Cancer Council of Victoria
  24. Cancer Council of Tasmania
  25. Cancer Council of South Australia
  26. Cancer Foundation of Western Australia
  27. German Cancer Aid [109076]
  28. Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC)
  29. Cancer Research UK [C1287/A10118, C1287/A11990, C1287/A 10710, C12292/A11174, C1281/A12014, C5047/A8384, C5047/A15007, C5047/A10692, C1287/A12014]
  30. National Cancer Institute [UM1 CA164920]
  31. Breast Cancer Campaign forming Breast Cancer Now
  32. NHS
  33. Dietmar-Hopp Foundation
  34. Helmholtz Society
  35. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
  36. Chief Physician Johan Boserup and LiseBoserup Fund
  37. Danish Medical Research Council
  38. Herlev Hospital
  39. Stockholm City Council
  40. KarolinskaInstitutet
  41. Stockholm Cancer Foundation
  42. Swedish Cancer Society
  43. Deutsche Krebshilfee.V. [70-2892-BR I]
  44. Hamburg Cancer Society
  45. German Cancer Research Center
  46. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany [01KH0402]
  47. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC)
  48. Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer [CA116201]
  49. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  50. VicHealth
  51. Cancer Council Victoria
  52. Australian NHMRC [209057, 251553, 504711]
  53. Marit and Hans Rausings Initiative Against Breast Cancer
  54. Swedish Medical Research Counsel
  55. CRUK [A490/A11021, C490/A16561]
  56. European Community [223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175), 223175, HEALTH-F2-2009-223175]
  57. National Institutes of Health [CA128978]
  58. Post-Cancer GWAS initiative [1U19 CA148537, 1U19 CA148065, 1U19 CA148112]
  59. Department of Defence [W81XWH-10-1-0341]
  60. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for the CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer
  61. Komen Foundation for the Cure
  62. Ovarian Cancer Research Fund
  63. Cancer Research-UK [C1287/A10118, C12292/A11174]
  64. Cancer Research UK [20861, 11174, 10118] Funding Source: researchfish
  65. National Breast Cancer Foundation [IF-12-06] Funding Source: researchfish
  66. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1061779] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We confirm that BRCA1c.[594-2A > C;641A > G] should not be considered a high-risk pathogenic variant. Importantly, results from our detailed mRNA analysis suggest that BRCA-associated cancer risk is likely not markedly increased for individuals who carry a truncating variant in BRCA1 exons 9 or 10, or any other BRCA1 allele that permits 20-30% of tumor suppressor function. More generally, our findings highlight the importance of assessing naturally occurring alternative splicing for clinical evaluation of variants in disease-causing genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据