4.0 Article

Association of p53 codon 72 polymorphism and hTERT polymorphism (rs2736098) with risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. A pilot study in Egyptian patients

期刊

GENE REPORTS
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101255

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Gene polymorphism; HTERT; P53

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found an association between p53 and hTERT gene polymorphisms and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in Egyptian patients, suggesting they could serve as potential non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis of HCC.
Human HCC is among the most frequent worldwide malignancies. However, no effective therapy has existed as of yet. The purpose of this study is to look into the molecular evaluation of the p53 Arg72Pro and hTERT rs2736098 polymorphisms in hepatocellular carcinoma. The study was conducted in 70 untreated known cases of HCC and 40 healthy controls. The levels of alfa fetoprotein (AFP) were tests for all samples to detect the early stages of HCC. Triphasic CT was abdomen for patients with HCC to determine the stages of HCC. All samples were tests for biochemical and hematological parameters as liver functions tests. Genotyping of hTERT and p53 gene was done by PCR-Restricted fragment length polymorphism-PCR (PCR-RFLP). P53 Arg72Pro distributions showed that there are statistically significant differences between HCC and the control group in either genotype (Arg/Arg) or allele (G) distribution. Moreover, a significant association was found between HCC and the control group regarding hTERT rs2736098 (GG) genotype and (G) allele. No statistically significant correlation was detected between the studied polymorphisms and the clinicopathologic markers or SNPs stratification based on HCV carrier in HCC groups. In Conclusion: There is an association of p53 codon 72 polymorphism and hTERT polymorphism (rs2736098) with risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in Egyptian patients, which could be used as a potential non-invasive biomarker to attain early diagnosis of HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据