4.2 Review

Device-measured sedentary behavior in oldest old adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101405

关键词

Older adults; Physical activity; Sitting; Accelerometry; activPAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that older adults aged 80 and older tend to have high levels of sedentary behavior, with male gender and age over 85 possibly contributing to increased sedentary behavior. Factors associated with sedentary behavior include older age, male gender, non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity, social disadvantage, and declining cognitive function.
Sedentary behavior contributes to health decline and frailty in older adults, especially the oldest old. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence describing the volume of device-measured sedentary behavior and factors that influence sedentary behavior in community-dwelling adults aged 80 and older. Four electronic databases were searched in August 2018; the search was updated in September 2019 and December 2020. Twenty-one articles representing 16 unique datasets from six countries met inclusion criteria. Various devices and data processing methods were used to measure sedentary behavior; the most common device was the ActiGraph accelerometer. Sedentary time during the waking day ranged from 7.6 to 13.4 h/day. Studies using similar measurement methods (hip-worn ActiGraph with uniaxial cut-point 100 counts per minute) had a weighted mean of 10.6 h/day. Subgroup analyses revealed that male gender and age 85 may contribute to increased sedentary behavior. Only seven individual articles examined factors that influence sedentary behavior in the 80 and older age group; older age, male gender, non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity, social disadvantage, and declining cognitive function (in men) were associated with increased sedentary behavior. In conclusion, the oldest old are highly sedentary and little is known about factors that influence their sedentary behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据