4.7 Article

Combining multiple anatomical MRI measures improves Alzheimer's disease classification

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 1920-1929

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23147

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; anatomical MRI; cortical thickness; cortical area; cortical curvature; grey matter density; subcortical volumes; hippocampal shape; classification

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [016130677, 05613010, 05613018]
  2. Dioraphte Foundation [09-02-03-00]
  3. Association for Frontotemporal Dementia Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several anatomical MRI markers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been identified. Hippocampal volume, cortical thickness, and grey matter density have been used successfully to discriminate AD patients from controls. These anatomical MRI measures have so far mainly been used separately. The full potential of anatomical MRI scans for AD diagnosis might thus not yet have been used optimally. In this study, we therefore combined multiple anatomical MRI measures to improve diagnostic classification of AD. For 21 clinically diagnosed AD patients and 21 cognitively normal controls, we calculated (i) cortical thickness, (ii) cortical area, (iii) cortical curvature, (iv) grey matter density, (v) subcortical volumes, and (vi) hippocampal shape. These six measures were used separately and combined as predictors in an elastic net logistic regression. We made receiver operating curve plots and calculated the area under the curve (AUC) to determine classification performance. AUC values for the single measures ranged from 0.67 (cortical thickness) to 0.94 (grey matter density). The combination of all six measures resulted in an AUC of 0.98. Our results demonstrate that the different anatomical MRI measures contain complementary information. A combination of these measures may therefore improve accuracy of AD diagnosis in clinical practice. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1920-1929, 2016. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据