4.7 Article

The effects of low-dose ketamine on the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in treatment-resistant depression: A randomized controlled study

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 1080-1090

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23085

关键词

treatment-resistant depression; ketamine; glucose; prefrontal cortex

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [102-2314-B-010-060, 103-2314-B-075-072-MY3, 103-2325-B-039-005, 104-2325-B-039-004]
  2. Taipei veterans general hospital [VGHUST102-G4-3-1, VGHUST104-G4-1-2, V104E9-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundLow-dose ketamine has been found to have robust and rapid antidepressant effects. A hypoactive prefrontal cortex (PFC) and a hyperactive amygdala have been suggested to be associated with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, it is unclear whether the rapid antidepressant mechanisms of ketamine on TRD involve changes in glutamatergic neurotransmission in the PFC and the amygdala. MethodsA group of 48 TRD patients were recruited and equally randomized into three groups (A: 0.5 kg/mg-ketamine; B: 0.2 kg/mg-ketamine; and C: normal saline [NS]). Standardized uptake values (SUV) of glucose metabolism measured by F-18-FDG positron-emission-tomography before and immediately after a 40-min ketamine or NS infusion were used for subsequent region-of-interest (ROI) analyses (a priori regions: PFC and amygdala) and whole-brain voxel-wise analyses and were correlated with antidepressant responses, as defined by the Hamilton depression rating scale score. The F-18-FDG signals were used as a proxy measure of glutamate neurotransmission. ResultsThe ROI analysis indicated that Group A and Group B, but not Group C, had increases in the SUV of the PFC (group-by-time interaction: F=7.373, P=0.002), whereas decreases in the SUV of the amygdala were observed in all three groups (main effect of time, P<0.001). The voxel-wise analysis further confirmed a significant group effect on the PFC (corrected for family-wise errors, P<0.05; post hoc analysis: Group A

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据