3.8 Article

Hinting a dark matter nature of Sgr A* via the S-stars

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slab051

关键词

Elementary particles; Dark matter

资金

  1. COLCIENCIAS under the programme Becas Doctorados Nacionales [727]
  2. International Centre for Relativistic Astrophysics Network (ICRANet)
  3. Universidad Industrial de Santander (UIS)
  4. International Relativistic Astrophysics Ph.D. Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The motion data of S-stars around the Galactic Centre gathered in the last 28 yr suggests that Sgr A* hosts a supermassive compact object close to 4 x 10(6) solar masses, not a traditional black hole, possibly related to a core-halo distribution of dark matter termed "darkinos." By using astrometry data of S2 and G2, the alternative nature of Sgr A* as a dense core of darkinos is confirmed and extended.
The motion data of the S-stars around the Galactic Centre gathered in the last 28 yr imply that Sgr A* hosts a supermassive compact object of about 4 x 10(6) M-circle dot, a result awarded with the Nobel Prize in Physics 2020. A non-rotating black hole (BH) nature of Sgr A* has been uncritically adopted since the S-star orbits agree with Schwarzschild geometry geodesics. The orbit of S2 has served as a test of general relativity predictions such as the gravitational redshift and the relativistic precession. The central BH model is, however, challenged by the G2 post-peripassage motion and by the lack of observations on event-horizon-scale distances robustly pointing to its univocal presence. We have recently shown that the S2 and G2 astrometry data are better fitted by geodesics in the spacetime of a self-gravitating dark matter core-halo distribution of 56 keV-fermions, 'darkinos', which also explains the outer halo Galactic rotation curves. This letter confirms and extends this conclusion using the astrometry data of the 17 best-resolved S-stars, thereby strengthening the alternative nature of Sgr A* as a dense core of darkinos.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据