3.8 Article

On the population III binary black hole mergers beyond the pair-instability mass gap

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slab052

关键词

gravitational waves; binaries: general; stars: Population III

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI grant [17H06360, 19K03907, 21K13915, 20H05249, 17H01130, 17K05380, 21H01123]
  2. University of Tokyo Young Excellent Researcher program
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21K13915, 21H01123, 20H05249] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that in the presence of very massive third-generation stars, binary black hole mergers can reach a maximum mass of 686 solar masses, with low effective inspiral spin. No conclusive detection of mergers beyond the mass gap has been made so far, and future gravitational wave detectors are expected to observe more merger events.
We perform a binary population synthesis calculation incorporating very massive population (Pop.) III stars up to 1500 M-circle dot and investigate the nature of binary black hole (BBH) mergers. Above the pair-instability mass gap, we find that the typical primary black hole (BH) mass is 135-340 M-circle dot. The maximum primary BH mass is as massive as 686 M-circle dot. The BBHs with both of their components above the mass gap have low effective inspiral spin similar to 0. So far, no conclusive BBH merger beyond the mass gap has been detected, and the upper limit on the merger rate density is obtained. If the initial mass function (IMF) of Pop. III stars is simply expressed as xi(m)(m) alpha m(-alpha) (single power law), we find that alpha >= 2.8 is needed in order for the merger rate density not to exceed the upper limit. In the future, the gravitational wave detectors such as Einstein Telescope and Pre-DECIGO will observe BBH mergers at high redshift. We suggest that we may be able to impose a stringent limit on the Pop. III IMF by comparing the merger rate density obtained from future observations with that derived theoretically.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据