4.1 Article

National Suicide Prevention Lifeline crisis chat interventions: Evaluation of chatters' perceptions of effectiveness

期刊

SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 1126-1137

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12795

关键词

crisis chat; effectiveness; lifeline; suicide

资金

  1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) through ICF Macro, Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the Lifeline's online crisis chat services are effective in reducing the distress of chatters, with a majority of suicidal chatters reporting that the chat was helpful and nearly half reporting a decrease in suicidal ideation.
Objective As part of the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline's crisis response system, the Lifeline Crisis Chat Network (LCC) answers chats from hundreds of thousands of at-risk individuals yearly. The study's objective was to assess the effectiveness of these online crisis interventions. Method Data from 39,911 pre-chat surveys and 13,130 linked pre- and post-chat surveys completed by LCC chatters from October 2017-June 2018 were analyzed. The relationship of several effectiveness measures with chatter demographics, pre-chat distress, suicidal ideation, and chatters' perceptions of engagement with their counselors was examined using a series of logistic regression analyses. Results Chatters were significantly and substantially less distressed at the end of the chat intervention than at the beginning. By the end of the chat, two-thirds of suicidal chatters reported that the chat had been helpful, while just under half reported being less suicidal. Conclusions Our study offers empirical evidence for the Lifeline's online crisis chat services' effectiveness, but also highlights areas for improvement. This is of critical import in light of the recent designation of 988 as the nationwide number for the Lifeline beginning in 2022, which will increase the Lifeline's prominence in providing suicide prevention and mental health crisis interventions in the United States.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据