4.3 Article

Late-Holocene atmospheric dust deposition in eastern Canada (St. Lawrence North Shore)

期刊

HOLOCENE
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 12-25

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0959683616646185

关键词

atmospheric dust; climatic events; eastern Canada; geochemistry; lead-210; peat; radiocarbon

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [250287]
  2. Fonds de Recherche Quebec - Nature et Technologie (FRQNT) [176250, 180723]
  3. Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse ('Soutien a la mobilite') grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dust deposition in two ombrotrophic peatlands (Baie and Ile du Havre peatland (IDH) bogs) of the Estuary and Gulf of the St. Lawrence in eastern Canada was reconstructed using elemental geochemistry. The rare earth elements (REEs) and other lithogenic element concentrations were measured by ICP-oES and Q-ICP-MS along two peat cores spanning the last 4000years. Principal component analyses on the geochemical profiles show that REEs display the same behavior as Al, Ti, Sc, and Zr, all conservative elements, which suggests that REEs are immobile in the studied peat bogs and can be used as tracers of dust deposition. Plant macrofossils were also used to infer past environmental and humidity changes. The dust fluxes were reconstructed using the sum of REEs (sigma REE). The range of dust deposition varies from 0.2 to 3.8gm(-2)yr(-1) in the Baie bog, while the IDH bog shows lower fluxes ranging between 0.1 and 1.2gm(-2)yr(-1). The highest dust fluxes in the Baie bog were recorded from 1750-1000 cal. BP to 600-100 cal. BP and occur at the same time as periods of high variability in the macrofossil record (i.e. successive layers dominated by Sphagnum or Ericaceae). The timing of these events in the dust and macrofossil records also corresponds to documented cold periods. These two periods have been identified as episodes of climatic instability, which could have been caused by changes in the wind regime.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据