4.0 Article

Digital twins: artificial intelligence and the IoT cyber-physical systems in Industry 4.0

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s41315-021-00180-5

关键词

Digital twin; Industrial internet of things; Cyber physical systems; Human and robot interactions; Industry 4.0; Bibliometric analysis

类别

资金

  1. UK EPSRC [EP/S035362/1]
  2. Cisco Research Centre [CG1525381]
  3. EPSRC [EP/S035362/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the evolution of artificial intelligence in internet of things networks through exploring the use of new technologies in industrial systems and the correlation between academic literature and Industry 4.0 interdependencies. The novelty lies in introducing the concept of digital twin and applying grounded theory analysis to complex interconnected systems. By connecting human-computer interactions, the paper offers a summary of mechanisms for the evolution of artificial intelligence in IoT networks.
This paper presents a summary of mechanisms for the evolution of artificial intelligence in 'internet of things' networks. Firstly, the paper investigates how the use of new technologies in industrial systems improves organisational resilience supporting both a technical and human level. Secondly, the paper reports empirical results that correlate academic literature with Industry 4.0 interdependencies between edge components to both external and internal services and systems. The novelty of the paper is a new approach for creating a virtual representation operating as a real-time digital counterpart of a physical object or process (i.e., digital twin) outlined in a conceptual diagram. The methodology applied in this paper resembled a grounded theory analysis of complex interconnected and coupled systems. By connecting the human-computer interactions in different information knowledge management systems, this paper presents a summary of mechanisms for the evolution of artificial intelligence in internet of things networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据