3.8 Article

Endocan serum levels in patients with low- and high-grade meningiomas: does this biomarker have an indicative role?

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s41983-021-00346-9

关键词

Cancer biomarker; Endocan; Meningiomas

资金

  1. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences [15233-01-01-1396]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the relationship between endocan serum levels and low- and high-grade meningiomas, revealing that higher grades of meningiomas had higher endocan serum levels. However, further assessment is required to understand the specific role of endocan in the pathogenesis or progression of this type of tumor.
Background Meningiomas are one of the most common tumors of the brain and central nervous system. The key role of endocan in predicting tumor growth and prognosis has been shown for several types of cancers; however, this role in meningiomas has not been evaluated. In the current study, we investigated the relationship between endocan serum levels with low- and high-grade meningiomas. Results The serum level of endocan in the group with meningiomas was 283.34 (242.09-358.70) pg/ml and in the control group was 250.29 (207.56-329.71) pg/ml respectively (P = 0.172). Afterwards, patients were divided into three different groups (grades I, II, and III) and compared to the control. The level of endocan in the group with grade I of meningioma showed no significant difference compared to control individuals (P = 0.86). When patients with grade II and grade III compared with the control group, endocan serum levels were statistically significant (P = 0.002, P < 0.001 respectively). Moreover, our findings showed that the different grades of meningiomas were statistically significant compared to each other (P < 0.001) regarding endocan serum levels, meaning that the higher the grade, the higher the endocan serum levels. Conclusion Our findings revealed that higher grades of meningioma had higher endocan serum levels, however, the role of endocan in pathogenesis or progression of this type of tumor requiring further exclusively assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据