4.8 Article

Affinity Maturation of a Broadly Neutralizing Human Monoclonal Antibody That Prevents Acute Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Mice

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 1922-1933

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.28850

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/NIH [R41-AI108024, U19-AI123862, R21-AI126582, HHSN2722010000016I]
  2. Mpower
  3. EU FP7 Hepamab
  4. Laboratory of Excellence HepSys

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct- acting antivirals (DAAs) have led to a high cure rate in treated patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but this still leaves a large number of treatment failures secondary to the emergence of resistance-associated variants (RAVs). To increase the barrier to resistance, a complementary strategy is to use neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies (HMAbs) to prevent acute infection. However, earlier efforts with the selected antibodies led to RAVs in animal and clinical studies. Therefore, we identified an HMAb that is less likely to elicit RAVs for affinity maturation to increase potency and, more important, breadth of protection. Selected matured antibodies show improved affinity and neutralization against a panel of diverse HCV isolates. Structural and modeling studies reveal that the affinity-matured HMAb mediates virus neutralization, in part, by inducing conformational change to the targeted epitope, and that the maturated light chain is responsible for the improved affinity and breadth of protection. A matured HMAb protected humanized mice when challenged with an infectious HCV human serum inoculum for a prolonged period. However, a single mouse experienced breakthrough infection after 63 days when the serum HMAb concentration dropped by several logs; sequence analysis revealed no viral escape mutation. Conclusion: The findings suggest that a single broadly neutralizing antibody can prevent acute HCV infection without inducing RAVs and may complement DAAs to reduce the emergence of RAVs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据