3.8 Article

Usefulness of SCT in detecting clinical reasoning deficits among pediatric professionals

期刊

PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2020.101340

关键词

Medical evaluation; Medical training; General practice; Pediatric cardiology; Script concordance test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In some Spanish autonomous communities, 30% to 50% of Primary Care Pediatric positions are filled by professionals without specific training in the specialty, leading to a lack of assessment and retraining on Pediatric Cardiology clinical reasoning.
Nowadays, in some Spanish autonomous communities, between 30% to 50% of the Primary CarePediatric positions are carried out by professionals without specific training in the specialty. In addition, when Spanish general practitioners with pediatric practice complete their Resident Medical Intern program are not evaluated on their Pediatric Cardiology clinical reasoning. Actual unawareness about this knowledge precludes professional retraining directed to solve deficiencies in this collective. Script Concordance Test is a new clinical reasoning assessment tool which places examinees in real clinical situations in which they have to interpret data and assess hypothesis to make decisions. This tool allows getting consistent data through variables analysis but it still hasn't been used in Spain for health professional's evaluation so far. Our goal is the development, validation, and application of a Script Concordance Test for clinical reasoning analysis in Pediatric Cardiology to ensure if practitioners attending children have enough Pediatric Cardiology knowledge for safe practice and to learn if qualification, Pediatric Cardiology formation, years of pediatric practice, and training course completion influence the score obtained. Our method describes a Script Concordance Test which was approved by a Pediatric Cardiology experts committee, met reliability criteria, allowed distinguishing evaluated subject different formative grade (188 pediatricians and 38 general practitioners), and was accessible for investigators. A statistical study including demographic and employment variables and achieved scores was performed to study a possible relationship between them. 4 pediatricians (2.1%) and 1 GP (2.6%) didn't pass the questionnaire. Pediatric Cardiology qualification and training programs influenced more in Pediatric Cardiology clinical reasoning than the accumulation of years of pediatric practice and the frequency of this practice. We observed that the older the professional was, the lowest the score in the questionnaire.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据