4.4 Editorial Material

Editorial: Understanding molecular interactions that underpin vascular mechanobiology

期刊

APL BIOENGINEERING
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0058611

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [AG045428, HL121365]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cells are constantly exposed to mechanical forces in their daily lives, which can lead to disease if excessive. Endothelial cells sense and transduce these forces, potentially affecting their morphology and fate. Seminal studies in endothelial cells over the past several decades have begun to elucidate some of these signals.
Cells are exposed to a variety of mechanical forces in their daily lives, especially endothelial cells that are stretched from vessel distention and are exposed to hemodynamic shear stress from a blood flow. Exposure to excessive forces can induce a disease, but the molecular details on how these cells perceive forces, transduce them into biochemical signals and genetic events, i.e., mechanotransduction, and integrate them into physiological or pathological changes remain unclear. However, seminal studies in endothelial cells over the past several decades have begun to elucidate some of these signals. These studies have been highlighted in APL Bioengineering and elsewhere, describing a complex temporal pattern where forces are sensed immediately by ion channels and force-dependent conformational changes in surface proteins, followed by biochemical cascades, cytoskeletal contraction, and nuclear remodeling that can affect long-term changes in endothelial morphology and fate. Key examples from the endothelial literature that have established these pathways include showing that integrins and Flk-1 or VE-cadherin act as shear stress transducers, activating downstream proteins such as Cbl and Nck beta or Src, respectively. In this Editorial, we summarize a recent literature highlighting these accomplishments, noting the engineering tools and analysis methods used in these discoveries while also highlighting unanswered questions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据