4.4 Article

Clinical and biophysical evaluation of variable bipolar configurations during radiofrequency ablation for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias

期刊

HEART RHYTHM
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 2161-2171

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.07.011

关键词

Bipolar radiofrequency ablation; Radiofrequency; Ventricular tachycardia; Arrhythmia; Active and Ground Catheters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (bRFA) has been used to create larger ablation lesions and to treat refractory arrhythmias. However, little is known about optimal bRFA settings. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate various bRFA settings, including active and ground catheter tip orientation and use of variable active and ground catheters during bRFA. METHODS Two ablation catheters, 1 active and 1 ground, were oriented across from each other, with viable bovine myocardium in between. The catheter tips were placed in various combinations perpendicular or parallel to the myocardium. The active catheter was either a 3.5-mm externally irrigated or 8-mm tip, and the ground catheter was either a 4-mm, 3.5-mm irrigated, or 8-mm tip. Retrospective analysis was undertaken for all bRFA performed at University of Colorado. RESULTS The largest and deepest lesions were produced using irrigated active and ground tips, oriented perpendicularly. In 14 cases (10 patients) of bRFA for ventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular complexes, acute success was achieved in 13 of 14 procedures. Long-term success was achieved in 7 of 10 patients, but 3 patients required multiple bRFA ablations. CONCLUSION Active and ground catheter tip orientation and type are important determinants of lesion sizes during bRFA. The largest and deepest lesions, without a higher incidence of steam pops, were achieved using 2 irrigated catheters. As the largest published series to date, bRFA ablation can be performed safely and effectively in humans. Larger studies are necessary to better evaluate bRFA efficacy and safety. (C) 2016 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据