4.0 Article

Women's Pathways to Digital Inclusion Through Digital Labour in Rural Farming Households

期刊

AUSTRALIAN FEMINIST STUDIES
卷 36, 期 107, 页码 43-64

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08164649.2021.1969519

关键词

Digital divide; agriculture; gender; farming; digital housekeeping

资金

  1. Australian Communications Consumer Action Network [2017042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study highlights the impact of digital divide in rural Australia on women, showing that they are more involved in digital labor compared to men, especially in online household activities. Women's greater expertise in digital technologies enables them to forge pathways to digital inclusion and self-determination, contributing to emergent understandings of digital labor and digital inclusion scholarship in rural contexts.
This study investigates how the digital divide in rural, agricultural Australia impacts women in significant and unexpected ways. Drawing on Marxist feminist perspectives on labour I ask, how do rural farming women access, use and manage digital connections and devices, and what role does gender play in the production of this 'digital labour'? Based on interviews conducted in Far North Queensland, I provide an account of digital labour in rural farming households showing that women often have more interaction with digital technologies than their male counterparts because they are responsible for domestic activities that are increasingly being conducted online. Women's consequent greater digital expertise enables them to forge pathways to digital inclusion and self-determination. Further analysis using Ursula Huws' ([2019]. Labour in Contemporary Capitalism: What Next? London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.) typology of labour confirms binary gender-based distribution of digital labour, but problematises how value is assigned to this work, in rural farming households. The research contributes to emergent understandings of digital labour and digital inclusion scholarship in rural contexts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据