4.2 Article

User Experiences of Eye Gaze Classroom Technology for Children With Complex Communication Needs

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 426-436

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/01626434211019399

关键词

social skills; content; curriculum area; universal design for learning; educational perspectives; speech or language disability; exceptionality; pedagogical agents; instructional; policy perspectives; small N; single subject design; methodologies

资金

  1. Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) [950-231395]
  2. Canada Research Chairs [501959]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that using eye tracking devices in special education classrooms can significantly improve students' abilities. Integrated systems are more effective, leading to longer training sessions and higher response rates.
This study examines interactions between students with atypical motor and speech abilities, their teachers, and eye tracking devices under varying conditions typical of educational settings (e.g., interactional style, teacher familiarity). Twelve children (aged 4-12 years) participated in teacher-guided sessions with eye tracking software that are designed to develop augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) skills. Assessments of expressive communication skills before and after the testing period demonstrated significant improvements. 164 sessions conducted over a 3-month period were analyzed for positive engagement (e.g., gaze direction, session time) and system effectiveness (e.g., lag time, gaze registration) between integrated and non-integrated systems. Findings showed that integrated systems were associated with significantly longer sessions, more time spent looking at the screen, greater proportion of gaze targets registered by the system, and higher response rate to prompts from teachers. We discuss the implications for the facilitated use of eye tracking devices in special education classrooms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据