3.8 Article

Flexor Synovectomy as an Adjunct to Carpal Tunnel Release in Primary Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis

期刊

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S2424835521500454

关键词

Synovectomy; Carpal tunnel syndrome

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic review comparing outcomes of CTR with and without FS in the treatment of primary CTS showed that FS did not provide any additional benefits post-operatively in terms of grip strength, symptom severity score, functional status score, median nerve motor latency, or major complications. Recurrence rate was not reported in the included studies. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings, and FS may have a role in recurrent or secondary CTS.
Background: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) aims to achieve surgical decompression of the median nerve for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Flexor tenosynovectomy (FS) has been carried out as an adjunct to routine CTR, on the basis that chronic flexor tenosynovitis has been implicated as an etiological factor in idiopathic CTS. However, the benefits of this additional procedure remains unclear. As such, we aimed to compare functional outcomes, nerve function and complication rates from CTR with and without FS. Methods: A systematic review of published literature was performed for original data English language studies comparing outcomes of CTR with and without FS in the treatment of primary CTS. Mean weighted differences and their 95% confidence interval were used for analysis. Results: Three studies comprising 292 wrists were included. Meta-analysis showed no improvement in post-operative grip strength, symptom severity score, functional status score, median nerve motor latency or major complications with FS. Recurrence rate was not reported in the 3 selected articles. Conclusions: The available evidence suggests FS is an unnecessary adjunct which provides no benefit to CTR, and should not be used routinely to treat primary CTS. Larger studies are needed to validate our findings. FS may have a role in recurrent or secondary CTS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据