4.0 Article

The Direct Cause of Amplified Wettability: Roughness or Surface Chemistry?

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES SCIENCE
卷 5, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcs5080213

关键词

amplified wettability; functional groups; hydrophobisation; roughness; surface chemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that rough glass surfaces exhibit higher hydrophobicity and higher reactivity towards DCDMS compared to smooth glass surfaces, indicating their chemical differences. Additionally, rough surfaces have a larger surface area and are bloated with functional groups that can amplify surface interactions.
Higher contact angles or amplified wettability observed on surfaces of rough solid materials are typically expressed as a function of a physical dimension (roughness factor). Herein, we present a simple experimental approach that demonstrates that roughness may only magnify the inherent surface chemistry that seems to have direct influence on surface wettability. We investigate gradual change in surface chemistry (hydrophobisation) of rough and smooth glass surfaces, from a very low concentration (10(-7) M) of dichlorodimethylsilane, DCDMS through various intermediate hydrophilic/hydrophobic states to when the surfaces are maximally hydrophobised with DCDMS at 0.1 M. The wettability of the modified glasses was studied by water contact angle measurements using drop shape analysis system (DSA). The data obtained indicate a deviation from Wenzel model, with the functionalized rough glass surfaces showing higher reactivity towards DCDMS when compared to the smooth glass surfaces, indicating that the two surfaces are not chemically identical. Our study reveals that just like transforming a solid material to powder, a well-divided glass (rough) surface may not only exhibit a greater surface area than the smooth counterpart as rightly predicted by the Wenzel model, but seems to be bloated with functional groups (-OH or -CH3) that can amplify surface interaction when such functional species dominate the solid surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据