3.8 Article

Fretting Wear and Scratch Resistance of Cold-Sprayed Pure Cu and Ti

期刊

METALLOGRAPHY MICROSTRUCTURE AND ANALYSIS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 496-513

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s13632-021-00758-2

关键词

Cold spray; Mechanical properties; Hardening; Wear damage; Fretting damage

资金

  1. Universita del Salento within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper investigates the fretting and wear behavior of pure copper and pure titanium coatings achieved through cold spray, finding that materials with low porosity and high strength exhibit high resistance to wear damaging. The hardness of the coatings varies based on distance from the substrate and thickness, influencing the response to wear damaging. Coatings with greater thickness demonstrate better wear resistance due to deformation hardening, but also exhibit brittle fracture at higher loads.
The paper analyses the fretting and wear behavior of pure copper and pure titanium coatings realized through cold spray. The coatings were designed and produced by employing processing conditions leading to minimum porosity and high hardness; these conditions were 700 degrees C and 40 bar for Ti powders and 400 degrees C and 30 bar for Cu ones. The low porosity and high strength materials led to high resistance to wear damaging through the optimal energy dissipation upon fretting. Due to the sprayed particles deformation mode, the sprayed materials show non-uniform hardening along the deposition distance. As a matter of fact, hardness varied in the range 3.7-4.2 GPa for Ti coatings and 1.5-2 GPa for the Cu ones depending on the distance from the substrate and on the coatings thickness. This influenced the materials properties and the response to the wear damaging. This was demonstrated by the scratch tests performed on coatings with different thicknesses. Those coatings sprayed in major thickness revealed the best wear resistance due to the deformation hardening. The harder coatings also revealed brittle fracture at the experienced highest loads.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据