3.8 Review

Cocaine induced heart failure: report and literature review

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1926614

关键词

Heart failure; cocaine; cardiomyopathy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome with high mortality and morbidity, and is a major public health issue. It can be caused by various etiologies, including substance abuse such as cocaine. Treatment involves stopping cocaine use and implementing guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure.
Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome associated with high mortality and morbidity, creating a major public healthcare problem. It has a variety of etiologies, including substance abuse. Cocaine-induced cardiotoxicity is caused by direct effects of inhibition of sodium channels and indirect effects by inhibiting catecholamine uptake leading to increased sympathetic activity. Management is through the cessation of cocaine use and implantation of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with the exception of beta-blockers as their safe usage is still controversial due to the risk of the unopposed alpha-adrenergic activity. Dexmedetomidine (Precedex) and Benzodiazepines (i.e., midazolam) are options for patients that demonstrate signs and symptoms of acute cocaine intoxication. If the actions of benzodiazepines fail to achieve hemodynamic stability, nitroglycerin may be used (especially in patients with cocaine-associated chest pain and hypertension). Cardiac transplantation is recommended for those who have demonstrated severe cardiovascular disease from cocaine. We present a 43-year-old male with a long-standing history of cocaine use who developed cardiomyopathy and severe acute decompensated heart failure found to have an ejection fraction of <20% admitted to the intensive care unit. He required inotropic support with milrinone and mechanical ventilation. He was later extubated and then discharged with an outpatient evaluation for a cardiac transplant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据