Two paths of social innovation in the post-pandemic world

Purpose The Covid-19 pandemic has initiated a period of radical uncertainty, resulting in impacts on a scale that has and will continue to transform economies and societies across various contexts. Social innovation resonates with the challenges the pandemic presents. This paper aims to address the question of which form of social innovation will be most pivotal in the post-pandemic world. Design/methodology/approach The paper has been developed by reviewing key literature on social innovation, with a specific focus on the most current contributions of Moulaert and MacCallum and Mulgan. Findings Social innovation is embedded in debates around social change but the type of social change that dominates the future of social innovation is connected to how social innovation interacts at different scales and with different actors engaged in shaping change in specific contexts. Building upon extant knowledge of social innovation we can hypothesise two paths of social innovation emerging/intensifying: one that seeks economic reform with an emphasis on meeting social needs in new ways and another that seeks complete systemic change. Originality/value This is a reflective piece that by reviewing current contributions to the social innovation literature questions the post-pandemic future of the field.

Automated summary

Social innovation is crucial in addressing the challenges brought by the pandemic, and two potential paths may emerge in the future: one seeking economic reform with a focus on meeting social needs in new ways, and another seeking complete systemic change.