3.9 Article

A simulation-optimization study of the inventory of a bike-sharing system: The case of Mexico City Ecobici's system

期刊

CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 1059-1072

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.01.014

关键词

Simulation-optimization; Bike-sharing system; Inventory

资金

  1. CONACYT through PNPC scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bike-sharing systems offer a healthy and environmentally friendly alternative for public transportation in large urban areas. Ecobici in Mexico City has rapidly grown since its establishment in 2010. To optimize bike inventory, a simulation-optimization framework has been proposed to minimize shortage events.
Bike-sharing systems (BSS) are a healthy and environmentally friendly alternative for public transportation in many large urban areas around the world. In 2010, Mexico City started its BSS, named Ecobici, with 84 stations and reached more than 840,000 trips that year. Ecobici rapidly became a preferred option for many users. By 2019, the number of stations in Ecobici had grown almost 6 times since the first year. In addition, the number of registered trips on 2019 was more than 8.4 million and the number of trips in a weekday were more than 30,000. In order to incentivize the adoption of bike as transportation mode, Ecobici and other BSS need to handle the bike inventory at their stations throughout the day. There are many challenges for optimizing bike inventory in BSS given the complex interdependencies, the non-homogeneous demand flows, and the large-scale scenarios. In this paper, we propose and study a simulation-optimization framework to minimize the number of shortage events (failed bike withdrawals and returns) by setting an adequate bike inventory at each station throughout the day. We propose an efficient modeling approach to simulate large-scale BSS and a simulation-optimization heuristic to optimize bike inventory. The experiments show that these algorithms obtain results with similar quality than other search methods, but in a significant shorter amount of time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据