4.4 Article

Necroptotic cell death in failing heart: relevance and proposed mechanisms

期刊

HEART FAILURE REVIEWS
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 213-221

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10741-016-9537-8

关键词

Heart failure; Cell death; Necroptosis; Apoptosis; Passive necrosis; Maladaptive autophagy

资金

  1. Slovak Scientific Grant Agency (VEGA) [VEGA 1/0638/12, 1/0271/16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As cardiomyocytes have a limited capability for proliferation, renewal, and repair, the loss of heart cells followed by replacement with fibrous tissue is considered to result in the development of ventricular dysfunction and progression to heart failure (HF). The loss of cardiac myocytes in HF has been traditionally believed to occur mainly due to programmed apoptosis or unregulated necrosis. While extensive research work is being carried out to define the exact significance and contribution of both these cell death modalities in the development of HF, recent knowledge has indicated the existence and importance of a different form of cell death called necroptosis in the failing heart. This new cell damaging process, resembling some of the morphological features of passive necrosis as well as maladaptive autophagy, is a programmed process and is orchestrated by a complex set of proteins involving receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 and 3 (RIP1, RIP3) and mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL). Activation of the RIP1-RIP3-MLKL signaling pathway leads to disruption of cation homeostasis, plasma membrane rupture, and finally cell death. It seems likely that inhibition of any site in this pathway may prove as an effective pharmacological intervention for preventing the necroptotic cell death in the failing heart. This review is intended to describe general aspects of the signaling pathway associated with necroptosis, to describe its relationship with cardiac dysfunction in some models of cardiac injury and discuss its potential relevance in various types of HF with respect to the underlying pathologic mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据