4.3 Article

Lifetime socioeconomic determinants of health trajectories among older adults

期刊

ADVANCES IN LIFE COURSE RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2021.100415

关键词

Health trajectories; Aging; Life course; Socioeconomic position; Vulnerability; Mexico

资金

  1. ANID/Millennium Science Initiative/Grant [NCS17_062]
  2. ANID/FONDECYT/INICIACION [11180360]
  3. ANID/FONDAP [15130009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drawing on life course theory and research, this study examined how socioeconomic circumstances during childhood and adulthood impact self-reported health trajectories among older Mexican adults. The findings revealed a more nuanced understanding of health status profiles in older adulthood for both men and women. Additionally, the study highlighted the complex relationship between life course circumstances and self-reported health trajectories.
Drawing on life course theory and research, we explored how socioeconomic circumstances during childhood and adulthood shape self-reported health trajectories among older Mexican adults. We used data from the Mexican Health and Aging Study panel survey (2001-2015) and used sequence analysis to estimate types of selfreported health trajectories in older adulthood. We then explored the association between those health trajectories and socioeconomic determinants at different life stages, including education, occupation, employment, economic status, parental education, and adverse living conditions and illnesses during childhood. Our contributions are threefold. First, we identified four types of health trajectories for men and eight for women, representing a more nuanced longitudinal health status profile than previously shown. Second, we found that childhood and adult socioeconomic circumstances influence self-reported health trajectories at older age. Third, our results suggest there is no simple monotonic relationship between life course circumstances and self-reported health trajectories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据