4.5 Article

Cross-sectional analysis of deprivation and ideal cardiovascular health in the Paris Prospective Study 3

期刊

HEART
卷 102, 期 23, 页码 1890-1897

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309502

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Agency (ANR)
  2. Research Foundation for Hypertension (FRHTA)
  3. Research Institute in Public Health (IRESP)
  4. Region Ile de France (Domaine d'Interet Majeur)
  5. GESTES/Region Ile-de-France
  6. French Ministry of Research and Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims We hypothesised that deprivation might represent a barrier to attain an ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) as defined by the American Heart Association (AHA). Methods and results The baseline data of 8916 participants of the Paris Prospective Study 3, an observational cohort on novel markers for future cardiovascular disease, were used. The AHA 7-item tool includes four health behaviours (smoking, body weight, physical activity and optimal diet) and three biological measures (blood cholesterol, blood glucose and blood pressure). A validated 11-item score of individual material and psychosocial deprivation, the Evaluation de la Precarite et des Inegalites dans les Centres d'Examens de Sante-Evaluation of Deprivation and Inequalities in Health Examination centres (EPICES) score was used. The mean age was 59.5 years (standard deviation 6.2), 61.2% were men and 9.98% had an ideal CVH. In sex-specific multivariable polytomous logistic regression, the odds ratio (OR) for ideal behavioural CVH progressively decreased with quartile of increasing deprivation, from 0.54 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.72) to 0.49 (0.37 to 0.65) in women and from 0.61 (0.50 to 0.76) to 0.57 (0.46 to 0.71) in men. Associations with ideal biological CVH were confined to the most deprived women (OR= 0.60; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.99), whereas in men, greater deprivation was related to higher OR of intermediate biological CVH (OR= 1.28; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.57 for the third quartile vs the first quartile). Conclusions Higher material and psychosocial deprivation may represent a barrier to reach an ideal CVH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据