4.1 Article

Television and the Honest Woman: Mediating the Labor of Believability

期刊

TELEVISION & NEW MEDIA
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 127-147

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15274764211045742

关键词

sexual violence; gender; believability; MeToo; I May Destroy You; The Morning Show; Unbelievable

向作者/读者索取更多资源

These three streaming series delve deep into the experiences of women experiencing sexual violence, creating a fictionalized real world phenomenon that reflects deeply rooted assumptions about women, sexual violence, and believability. The programs reveal the struggle for belief and the controversies surrounding visibility, authenticity, and recognition in the context of an intersectional economy of believability.
Between 2019 and 2020, three streaming series premiered on Netflix, Apple+, and BBC One/HBO: Unbelievable, The Morning Show, and I May Destroy You. All three narratively centered sexual violence against women, foregrounding the experiences of the women characters, and were produced within the context of the global movement #MeToo. We offer a conjunctural analysis of these programs within what we call the economy of believability, arguing that these shows should be read as fictionalized real-world phenomena, distilled for television but nonetheless reflective of deeply sedimented assumptions about women, sexual violence, and believability. We argue that the programs examine the struggle for belief as it manifests in three key forms of labor: (1) the affective performance of believability; (2) payment of the costs of believability; (3) entrepreneurially attaching value to believability. Our analysis positions the discourses and narratives of these shows-and of the real-world contexts they speak to-within the broader frame of a mediated, intersectional economy of believability, where contestations about how and when women may be believed play out in and through struggles over visibility, authenticity, and recognition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据