3.8 Review

Tramadol as a local anaesthetic agent in dentistry: A systematic review of local and systemic adverse effects

期刊

SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 842-852

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.09.015

关键词

Tramadol; Local anaesthetic; Dentistry; Oral surgery; Adverse effects; Side effects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tramadol is an effective local anaesthetic in dentistry with a low prevalence of adverse effects. Nausea and dizziness were the most commonly reported adverse effects, and the use of tramadol as a sole local anaesthetic showed lower incidence of adverse effects compared to when used as an adjunct.
Tramadol is an effective alternative local anaesthetic (LA) agent available in dentistry. This review aims to help guide practice by providing clinicians with relevant data regarding adverse effects (AE) associated with locally administered tramadol in the oral environment. A systematic search of three electronic databases was performed to identify relevant studies reporting AE associated with locally administered tramadol in the oral setting. Selected studies were reviewed and included based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data collected included: publication year, study design, participant numbers, adverse effects and follow-up duration. Fifteen articles were included comprising of 547 tramadol participants across eight exodontia and seven non-exodontia studies. Thirty-eight associated AE were reported. Nausea was the most commonly reported (4.6%), followed by dizziness (1.3%), vomiting (0.7%) and local erythema (0.4%). No other AE were reported. The prevalence of total AE was similar in >= 50 mg tramadol doses (7.2-7.3%); however the total affected number is not dose dependent. The prevalence of AE and affected participants was less when tramadol was used as a sole LA rather than as an adjunct (5.6% vs. 7.9% and 3.4-5.6% vs. 6.3%, respectively). Thus, tramadol is a safe LA agent with a low prevalence of AE when administered in the dental setting. (C) 2021 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据