4.5 Review

Cardiac MRI evaluation of myocardial disease

期刊

HEART
卷 102, 期 18, 页码 1429-1435

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309077

关键词

-

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [FS/16/46/32187, FS/10/40/28260, FS/12/56/29723] Funding Source: Medline
  2. British Heart Foundation [FS/16/46/32187, FS/10/40/28260, FS/12/56/29723] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2016-19-501, ACF-2014-19-002] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a key imaging technique for cardiac phenotyping with a major clinical role. It can assess advanced aspects of cardiac structure and function, scar burden and other myocardial tissue characteristics but there is new information that can now be derived. This can fill many of the gaps in our knowledge with the potential to change thinking, disease classifications and definitions as well as patient care. Established techniques such as the late gadolinium enhancement technique are now embedded in clinical care. New techniques are coming through. Myocardial tissue characterisation techniques, particularly myocardial mapping can precisely measure tissue magnetisationT1, T2, T2* and also the extracellular volume. These change in disease. Key biological pathways are now open for scrutiny including focal fibrosis (scar) and diffuse fibrosis, inflammation, metabolism and infiltration. Other new areas to engage in where major insights are growing include detailed assessments of myocardial mechanics and performance, spectroscopy and hyperpolarised CMR. In spite of the advances, challenges remain, particularly surrounding utilisation, technical development to improve accuracy, reproducibility and deliverability, and the role of multidisciplinary research to understand the detailed pathological basis of the MR signal changes. Collectively, these new developments are galvanising CMR uptake and having a major translational impact on healthcare globally and it is steadily becoming key imaging tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据