4.1 Article

Experimental Investigation of Influence of Piston Pin-Offset on Reduction of Piston Slap Noise

期刊

JOURNAL OF FAILURE ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 1195-1202

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s11668-021-01193-9

关键词

Piston slap; Piston pin-offset; Acoustic sensor; Accelerometer; NVH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the influence of piston pin-offset on reducing noise and vibration caused by piston slap. Experimental results showed that optimization of piston and cylinder-liner design can minimize stress values and noise intensity.
Piston slap is the primary source of noise and vibration in an Internal Combustion Engine. In this work, an experimental study of influence of piston pin-offset on reducing noise and vibration due to piston slap is described. The vibration and noise signals are acquired experimentally on time response and then these are plotted on frequency response. The noise levels of the engine operating at maximum pressure at TDC (Top Dead Center), BDC (Bottom Dead Center) and at the middle of the stroke are captured. These correlation results show that maximum values of vibration and noise levels correspond to the TDC region where the stress levels are high. Hence, design optimization of the piston, cylinder-liner and other parts can be made to minimize the stress values so that the corresponding noise level is also minimized. One of the methods to minimize the piston slap noise is by providing the piston pin-offset. In the present study, the piston geometry is redesigned for the pin-offsets of 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 mm. The noise and vibration frequency spectrum and plots of the noise levels (air borne) in terms of dB(A) are obtained by conducting experiments on a running Internal Combustion Engine. It is found from these observations that there is an improvement observed for both stress values and reduction in noise intensity, for the piston pin-offset of 0.3 mm, of the Internal Combustion Engine considered for the study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据