4.4 Article

Economic impact of 2015 transboundary haze on Singapore

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101329

关键词

Haze; Air pollution; Tangible costs; Intangible costs; Cost-benefit analysis

资金

  1. Singapore's Ministry of Education AcRF Tier 1 [RG148/16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study quantified the economic impact of transboundary haze pollution in 2015 on Singapore, including both tangible and intangible costs. The total cost of the haze episode was estimated at S$1.83 billion, with important implications for public policy.
We quantify and estimate the economic impact of the transboundary haze pollution in 2015 on Singapore following reliable quantitative methods and techniques in cost-benefit analysis. We include in the estimation both tangible and intangible costs associated to haze pollution. Specifically, in the estimation of the tangible costs of haze, the estimation includes (1) adverse impacts of haze on health, (2) loss in tourism, (3) loss in business as an indirect effect from loss of tourist receipts, (4) productivity loss due to restricted activity days and (5) cost of mitigation and adaptation by government agencies and households. For the estimation of the intangible costs, the value is derived from the contingent valuation study of Quah et al., 2018 which was conducted in 2018 to estimate Singapore residents' willingness to pay for a pro-environment collaboration project that could effectively stop slash and burn practices and significantly reduce the annual haze pollution issue. The total cost of the 2015 haze episode on Singapore which lasted for 2 months is estimated at S $1.83 billion, amounting to 0.45 % of the country's gross domestic product. Accordingly, the total tangible cost is estimated at S$1.46 billion equivalent to 0.36 % of GDP while the total intangible cost stands at S$0.36 billion equivalent to 0.09 % of GDP. The findings have important implications for public policy. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据