4.1 Article

Do ESG strategies enhance bank stability during financial turmoil? Evidence from Europe

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 1173-1211

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2021.1964556

关键词

Corporate social responsibility (CSR); environmental social governance (ESG) scores; non-financial reporting; European banking; bank stability; financial crisis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study finds that the total ESG score, as well as its sub-pillars, have a stabilizing effect on bank fragility, especially during financial crises, with higher ESG rated banks experiencing more significant stability improvements. Additionally, the longer the duration of ESG disclosures, the greater the benefits on stability. The linkages between ESG and bank stability vary significantly across banks' characteristics and operating environments, supporting regulatory efforts to enhance non-financial information disclosure.
This paper investigates the joint and separate effects of Environmental (E), Social (S), and Governance (G) scores on bank stability. Using a sample of European banks operating in 21 countries over 2005-2017, we find that the total ESG score, as well as its sub-pillars, reduces bank fragility during periods of financial distress. This stabilizing effect holds strongly for banks with higher ESG ratings. These results are confirmed by a differences-in-differences (DID) analysis built around the introduction of the EU 2014 Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). Our evidence also reveals that, in times of financial turmoil, the longer the duration of ESG disclosures, the greater the benefits on stability. Finally, we show that the ESG-bank stability linkages vary significantly across banks' characteristics and operating environments. Our findings are robust to selection bias and endogeneity concerns. Overall, they support the regulatory effort in requiring an enhanced disclosure of non-financial information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据