4.1 Article

Formation, structure, and optical properties of copper chromite thin films for high-temperature solar absorbers

期刊

MATERIALIA
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101156

关键词

Solar absorber; Spinels; Sputtering; Phase transformations; Optical materials

资金

  1. Helmholtz Initiative and Networking Funds via the W2/W3 programme [W2/W3-026]
  2. Helmholtz Initiative and Networking Funds via the Helmholtz Excellence Network DCM-MatDNA [ExNet-0028]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education of Research (BMBF) of HEMCP [03SF0451]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CuCr2O4 thin films grown by physical vapour deposition show high phase purity and absorb light in the entire solar spectral range from 300 to 2500 nm. The energy gap of the films is found to be < 0.5 eV, and their estimated solar absorptance is 0.85.
CuCr2O (4) thin films grown by physical vapour deposition were studied in order to evaluate their potential as absorber material for the next generation of concentrated solar power plants. A series of Cu-Cr-O thin films was deposited by reactive ion beam sputtering. The Cr/Cu ratio in the sputter target is demonstrated as the most important parameter to achieve the intended film stoichiometry. In-air annealing at 800 degrees C leads to structural transformations of the as-deposited films and results in phase compositions according to those expected from the ternary Cu-Cr-O phase diagram. Tetragonal CuCr2O4 with 98.6 at.% phase purity regarding the solid film constituents is obtained for the appropriate Cr/Cu ratio in the sputter target. CuCr O-2(4) thin films absorb light in the entire solar spectral range from 300 to 2500 nm. Their energy gap is found to be < 0.5 eV, and their solar absorptance is estimated to be (0.85 +/- 0.03). The dense microstructure with good thermal conductivity, full adhesion to the substrate, and a relatively low surface roughness are discussed as technological advantages of CuCr2O4 thin films grown by physical vapour deposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据