3.8 Article

Which Concept of Concept for Conceptual Engineering?

期刊

ERKENNTNIS
卷 88, 期 5, 页码 2145-2169

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-021-00447-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper addresses the lack of research on how to conceive concepts for the purpose of conceptual engineering. It proposes a methodological framework for evaluating concepts and develops a typology that contrasts philosophical and psychological concepts. The study shows that the psychological concept of concept is more effective for conceptual engineering. This provides a baseline for further improvement of conceptual engineering.
Conceptual engineering is the method for assessing and improving our concepts. However, little has been written about how best to conceive of concepts for the purposes of conceptual engineering. In this paper, I aim to fill this foundational gap, proceeding in three main steps: First, I propose a methodological framework for evaluating the conduciveness of a given concept of concept for conceptual engineering. Then, I develop a typology that contrasts two competing concepts of concept that can be used in conceptual engineering-namely, the philosophical and psychological ones. Finally, I evaluate these two concepts of concept using the proposed methodological framework and I show that, when it comes to making conceptual engineering an actionable method, the psychological concept of concept outclasses its philosophical counterpart on all counts. This provides a baseline from which the concept of concept can be further improved for the purposes of conceptual engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据