4.1 Article

Can Children Recognize Bodily Expressions of Emotion?

期刊

JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 505-518

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10919-021-00368-0

关键词

Emotion recognition; Bodily expression; Emotion

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) Insight grant [F17-04512]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous research shows that children can recognize facial expressions and static bodily expressions of negative emotions at a young age, with bodily expressions of sadness being identified as early as age 3, fear around ages 4-5, and anger between ages 6-8. Recognition of these expressions increases with age, indicating that children can reliably identify distinct negative emotions from bodily expressions, varying by age and emotion type.
Past research has demonstrated that children understand distinct emotion concepts and can accurately recognize facial expressions of distinct emotions by a young age, but few studies have assessed the age at which children develop the ability to recognize bodily expressions of distinct emotions. The current pre-registered research is the largest study to date (N = 552) examining the age at which children begin to recognize static bodily expressions of three negative emotions: anger, fear, and sadness. Our findings suggest that bodily expressions of sadness are recognized at rates consistently above chance by the age of 3-years, fear around the age of 4- to 5-years, and anger between the ages of 6- and 8-years. Recognition of all three expressions increased with age. The current research is the first to address this question using an entirely between-subjects design, allowing us to rule out the possibility that accurate recognition occurred as a result of a process of elimination or memory. Together, these findings suggest that children can reliably identify distinct negative emotions from bodily expressions, and this ability varies by age and the specific emotion being identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据