4.3 Article

Reliability of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III in differentiating between dementia, mild cognitive impairment and older adults who have not reported cognitive problems

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 495-507

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10433-021-00652-4

关键词

Cognitive screening test; Cognitive assessment; Alzheimer's disease; Vascular dementia; MCI; NHSCT Memory Service

资金

  1. Atlantic Philanthropies [17-F-1801]
  2. Department of Health [17-F-1801]
  3. Executive Office, Northern Ireland [17-F-1801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that ACE-III is reliable in differentiating between dementia, MCI, and controls, but not reliable in discriminating between dementia subtypes. Despite significant differences in scores across different cognitive domains, there is a high degree of overlap with no clinical relevance.
Diagnosing dementia can be challenging for clinicians, given the array of factors that contribute to changes in cognitive function. The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) is commonly used in dementia assessments, covering the domains of attention, memory, fluency, visuospatial and language. This study aims to (1) assess the reliability of ACE-III to differentiate between dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and controls and (2) establish whether the ACE-III is useful for diagnosing dementia subtypes. Client records from the Northern Health and Social Care Trust (NHSCT) Memory Service (n = 2,331, 2013-2019) were used in the analysis including people diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (n = 637), vascular dementia (n = 252), mixed dementia (n = 490), MCI (n = 920) and controls (n = 32). There were significant differences in total ACE-III and subdomain scores between people with dementia, MCI and controls (p < 0.05 for all), with little overlap between distribution of total ACE-III scores (< 39%) between groups. The distribution of total ACE-III and subdomain scores across all dementias were similar. There were significant differences in scores for attention, memory and fluency between Alzheimer's disease and mixed dementia, and for visuospatial and language between Alzheimer's disease-vascular dementia (p < 0.05 for all). However, despite the significant differences across these subdomains, there was a high degree of overlap between these scores (> 73%) and thus the differences are not clinically relevant. The results suggest that ACE-III is a useful tool for discriminating between dementia, MCI and controls, but it is not reliable for discriminating between dementia subtypes. Nonetheless, the ACE-III is still a reliable tool for clinicians that can assist in making a dementia diagnosis in combination with other factors at assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据