4.5 Article

Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of risk communication for maps depicting the hazard of COVID-19

期刊

TRANSACTIONS IN GIS
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 1158-1181

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12814

关键词

-

资金

  1. Innovation Work Project of Tobii Pro [202006]
  2. Major Project of the National Social Science Fund (NSSF) of China Theoretical and Practical Innovations for Evaluation Systems of Art Theory [21ZD11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that warm color schemes excel in visual cognition and understanding, while choropleth maps perform better in expressing risks. The combination of mixed color schemes with choropleth maps scored the highest in subjective satisfaction, providing a better reading experience.
COVID-19 maps convey hazard and risk information to the public, which play an important role in the risk communication for individual protection. The aim of this study is to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of communicating the specific risk of COVID-19 maps. By testing 71 subjects from Wuhan, China, this study explored how color schemes (cool, warm, and mixed colors) and data presentation forms (choropleth maps, graduated symbol maps) influence visual cognition patterns, risk perception, comprehension, and subjective satisfaction. The results indicated that the warm scheme (yellow/red) has significant strengths in visual cognition and understanding, and the choropleth map (vs. the graduated symbol map) has significant strengths in risk expression. On subjective satisfaction, the combination of the mixed scheme (blue/yellow/red) and the choropleth map scored highest mean value. These results have implications for enhancing the focused functions of COVID-19 maps that fit different terms: in the early and medium terms of disease transmission, choropleth maps with warm or cool colors should be considered as a priority design for their better risk perception. When the epidemic conditions are on the upturn, a better reading experience combination of choropleth maps with mixed colors can be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据