4.3 Article

Limited, considered and sustainable consumption: The (non)consumption practices of UK minimalists

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER CULTURE
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 1012-1031

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14695405211039608

关键词

minimalism; limited consumption; considered consumption; sustainable consumption; voluntary simplicity

资金

  1. Royal Geographical Society
  2. IBG Small Research Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Minimalism is a popular lifestyle movement in western economies that involves voluntarily reducing consumption, limiting possessions, and practicing intentional, considered, and sometimes ethical consumption to make space for important things that add meaning and value to life. This article highlights how minimalists in the UK practice sustainable (non)consumption through actively buying less, using and maintaining what they own, and acquiring objects with intentionality, consideration, and ethics.
Minimalism is an increasingly popular lifestyle movement in western economies (predominantly in the USA, Japan and Europe) that involves voluntarily reducing consumption and limiting one's possessions to a bare minimum. This is with the intention of making space for the 'important' (potentially immaterial) things that are seen to add meaning and value to one's life. Drawing on interviews with minimalists in the UK, this article reveals that minimalists practice sustainable (non)consumption via limiting their consumption. This is achieved by actively buying less, using up and maintaining what is owned, and, when objects are acquired, only practising highly intentional, considered and (sometimes) ethical consumption. For some, such practices are predominantly based on strong ethical and environmental motivations or are seen as a positive 'by-product' of their minimalist lifestyles. Whilst for others, their motivations are primarily aligned to personal well-being. The article subsequently argues that the limited and considered practices of minimalist consumption can be seen as sustainable practices in outcome, if not always in intent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据