4.4 Article

Is entrepreneurship a remedy for Chinese university graduates' unemployment under the massification of higher education? A case study of young entrepreneurs in Shenzhen

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102406

关键词

Massification of higher education; University graduates' entrepreneurship; Entrepreneurship education; Chinese higher education; Shenzhen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chinese higher education has made progress in expanding access since 1999, but the mismatch between university curricula and job market requirements results in unemployment issues for graduates. Policies promoting entrepreneurship have been issued by governments and universities to tackle this, but graduates still encounter barriers in starting their own businesses.
Chinese higher education has gained outstanding achievement in expanding its access to the mass population since 1999. However, the mismatch between university curricula and job market requirements leads to increasing unemployment and underemployment of Chinese graduates. In recent years, the central and local governments and universities have viewed entrepreneurship as an efficient means to solve the unemployment and underemployment issues of university graduates. They issued many policies to promote innovation and entrepreneurship among young people. However, university graduates are still facing barriers in deciding to start their entrepreneurial journey. In this qualitative study, we interviewed 37 young entrepreneurs in Shenzen. Results show that the respondents encountered barriers from three aspects: personal traits, resources, and culture. With the empirical data collected from the interviews, we aim to enable higher education professionals and innovation policymakers to develop an advanced understanding of the experiences of the new generation of entrepreneurs while reflecting the efforts in coping with the negative effects of the massification of higher education.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据