4.7 Article

Adoption of new technologies in developing countries: The case of autonomous car between Vietnam and Colombia

期刊

TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101674

关键词

New technologies adoption; Indulgence; restraint; Autonomous cars; Socio-technical transitions theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the moderating effect of Hofstede's cultural dimension of indulgence on the relationship between risk perception and purchase intention regarding autonomous cars in Colombia and Vietnam. The findings showed that indulgence had a direct influence on the adoption of new technologies, and moderation effects were found in different risk perceptions and purchase intentions.
The objective of the present study was to examine the moderating effect of Hofstede's cultural dimension of indulgence on the relationship between risk perception (financial, psychological, and time) and purchase intention regarding autonomous cars in Colombia and Vietnam using a multi-group model. A total of 800 Colombian and Vietnamese car drivers aged 18 or over participated by completing a personal questionnaire through a polling firm. The methodological contribution of the study is its use of variables related to the consumer and the environment that affect the adoption of this type of new technology. The findings showed that indulgence had a direct influence on the adoption of new technologies that have a lesser impact on the environment. For financial and psychological risk and the relationship with purchase intention, it was possible to find moderation effects in the country characterized by a low degree of indulgence. However, in the case of time risk, the moderation effect of indulgence was found in both countries (i.e., those with a low and high degree of indulgence). People in the country with a high degree of indulgence tended to feel anxious and stressed when faced with the decision to acquire the new technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据