4.7 Article

Is job performance conditioned by work-from-home demands and resources?

期刊

TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101672

关键词

Information and communication technologies; Anxiety; Smartphone addiction; Job demands-resources; Efficacy; Performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study argues that employees' anxiety towards ICT and smartphone addiction can hinder their performance while working from home, impacting the achievement of work goals. The findings significantly contribute to the relevant body of knowledge and offer practical strategies for improving remote work.
Substantial research has been dedicated to describing remote work, yet the understanding of working from home since the Covid-19 pandemic remains rather limited. While recognising the necessity for exploring employees' perceptions and interaction with technology as the ultimate requirement for a functional work-from-home, this study observes the factors that would determine job performance. Thus, adhering to the Job Demands-Resources theory, we argue that employees' ICT (Information and Communication Technologies) anxiety and smartphone addiction can inhibit their work progress by provoking interruptions in the course and reducing the efficacy, further affecting performance. PLS-SEM (Partial Least Squares - Structural Equation Modelling) was employed to analyse the data collected by 363 employees working from home due to Covid-19 restrictive measures. The results reveal that employees' reluctance and apprehensiveness related to the use of ICT and their dependency on smartphone usage act as distractions that impact the efficient achievement of work goals. The ensued findings valuably contribute to the relevant body of knowledge, while the implications offer helpful strategies for improving work-from-home. Finally, companies must simplify the transition to the home office, providing employees with job management and tools to ensure uninterrupted and productive working processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据