4.4 Article

Types of social capital in relation to self-rated health: Gender differences in a nationally representative cross-sectional study of South Korean adults

期刊

GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 1365-1378

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1924221

关键词

Social capital; self-rated health; population health; gender differences; South Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Socio-economic and cultural transformations in South Korea have led to changes in the role of social capital, and the relationship between different types of social capital and self-rated health varies by gender. Therefore, men and women may benefit from different forms of social capital in terms of health interventions.
Socio-economic and cultural transformations in South Korea have led to societal heterogeneity, potentially changing the role of social capital. We examined whether six factors (i.e. group membership, out-group trust, civic responsibility, acceptance, political activism, and institutional trust) that represent bonding, bridging, and linking social capital are associated with self-rated health (SRH), and whether these associations vary by gender. We analysed data from 8,000 adults in the Korea Social Integration Survey. We first conducted exploratory and confirmatory analyses to create and verify a social capital scale. Then, we performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to study how each type of social capital was related to SRH, adjusting for survey design and sampling weights. High levels of group membership and civic responsibility were associated with good SRH among men only, while high levels of out-group trust, acceptance, and institutional trust were associated with good SRH only for women. High levels of political activism were negatively related to good SRH for both men and women. Overall, associations between different types of social capital and SRH differed by gender in the South Korean context; thus, men and women may benefit from health interventions that enhance different forms of social capital.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据