4.3 Article

Detecting the historical roots of education for sustainable development (ESD): a bibliometric analysis

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-11-2020-0462

关键词

Education for sustainable development; Reference publication year spectroscopy; CRExplorer; Historical roots; Sustainable development

资金

  1. Zhejiang philosophy and Social Sciences key research base (Institute of China Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education of Wenzhou Medical University) [20JDZD042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides insights into the academic roots, theoretical foundations, and influential literature in the field of education for sustainable development. By analyzing cited references, the study identifies the theoretical grounding and important tools in this field.
Purpose Although several researchers have statistically analyzed references associated with education for sustainable development based on the co-citation frequency, evolutionary analysis based on high-citation references omits literature with low citation frequency, which has a significant impact on the evolution of a discipline. The purpose of this study is to understand and explore the historical processes and roots of the field of education for sustainable development and to understand the theoretical grounding of the field. Design/methodology/approach Based on education for sustainable development publications in the science citation index expanded and social sciences citation index databases from 1992 to August 2020, a new bibliometric method, reference publication year spectroscopy, was adopted to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the 58,588 cited references in 1,778 publications. Findings The earliest reference in the field of education for sustainable development traces back to 1732. There were 21 peaks in this field between 1732 and August 2020. Dewey's new three-center theory; Bloom's taxonomy; Freire's conscientization theory; the theory of planned behavior; Kolb's experiential learning theory; Wittgenstein's theoretical concepts of language-games, forms of life and rule-following and Leopold's land ethics laid an early theoretical grounding of educational philosophy and environmental ethics for research into education for sustainable development. The new environmental paradigm and the new ecological paradigm have become the most widely used methodological tools for understanding the values and attitudes of people toward the natural environment. Among the 50 most cited references, Lozano and Wals have published the most publications, contributing to promoting the development of research into education for sustainable development. The Journal of Cleaner Production, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education and Environmental Education Research have published the most publications related to the field of education for sustainable development. Originality/value The findings of this study are helpful for scholars and practitioners to understand the academic ideological roots, theoretical grounding and important influential literature in the field of education for sustainable development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据