4.4 Article

Can intersectionality help with understanding and tackling health inequalities? Perspectives of professional stakeholders

期刊

HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00742-w

关键词

Intersectionality; Survey; Workshop; Health inequalities; Stakeholder engagement; Health policy; Co-production; UK; Evidence-based policy

资金

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/R00921X/1]
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research [PD-SPH-2015-10025]
  3. ESRC [ES/R00921X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concept of intersectionality is increasingly recognized in public health arenas, with potential to advance health inequalities research and action. Professional stakeholders have generally positive views on intersectionality, but challenges exist in terms of its critical and transformative nature and methodological operationalization. Further exploration and promotion of intersectional approaches are needed to address health inequalities effectively.
Background The concept of intersectionality is increasingly employed within public health arenas, particularly in North America, and is often heralded as offering great potential to advance health inequalities research and action. Given persistently poor progress towards tackling health inequalities, and recent calls to reframe this agenda in the United Kingdom and Europe, the possible contribution of intersectionality deserves attention. Yet, no existing research has examined professional stakeholder understandings and perspectives on applying intersectionality to this field. Methods In this paper we seek to address that gap, drawing upon a consultation survey and face-to-face workshop (n = 23) undertaken in the United Kingdom. The survey included both researchers (n = 53) and policy and practice professionals (n = 20) with varied roles and levels of engagement in research and evaluation. Topics included familiarity with the term and concept intersectionality, relevance to health inequalities work, and issues shaping its uptake. Respondents were also asked to comment on two specific policy suggestions: intersectionally targeting and tailoring interventions, and evaluating the intersectional effects of policies. The workshop aims were to share examples of applying intersectionality within health inequalities research and practice; understand the views of research and practice colleagues on potential contributions and challenges; and identify potential ways to promote intersectional approaches. Results Findings indicated a generally positive response to the concept and a cautiously optimistic assessment that intersectional approaches could be valuable. However, opinions were mixed and various challenges were raised, especially around whether intersectionality research is necessarily critical and transformative and, accordingly, how it should be operationalized methodologically. Nonetheless, there was general agreement that intersectionality is concerned with diverse inequalities and the systems of power that shape them. Conclusions We position intersectionality within the wider context of health inequalities policy and practice, suggesting potential ways forward for the approach in the context of the United Kingdom. The views of policy and practice professionals suggest that intersectionality has far to travel to help counter individualistic narratives and to encourage an approach that is sensitive to subgroup inequalities and the processes that generate them. Examples of promising practice, albeit mostly in North America, suggest that it is possible for intersectionality to gain traction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据